![slate vcc on mixbus slate vcc on mixbus](https://i.ebayimg.com/thumbs/images/g/mvAAAOSwS2xf0PiZ/s-l225.jpg)
But i'm yet to get any real big projects going with it so don't know how reliable it is under load.Īll things considered, i'm really pleased with it so far although it still has the same age-old frustrations, despite it fooling you into thinking things are all shiny and new. However, it appears to be really easy to use and i'm sure once it's refined will be great if that's your cup of tea.įor me, i've found that X seems to runs better than 9 on the same hardware (Have an i5, i7 and 2.5ghz Core2Duo machines). One thing that is evident with Flex Pitch is that it does sound auto-tuned. Not being a user of Melodyne i can't compare with Flex pitch, and i also dislike hearing auto-tune in tracks. The bottom line is, get the best equipment and tools you can afford so that it is not a hinderance to you and work on your mixing skills as that has the biggest impact.The drummer is surprisingly good from a song writing perspective, didn't think i would use it that much but i'm finding that is' one of the first tracks i add when creating a new project. A less skilled engineer can have a million dollars worth of equipment, software, and plugins and still not sound good (but it'll be fun to have). A good engineer with good source material can make musical magic on just about any DAW or tape deck for that matter. The real difference is the way the tools are used. All these factors make only the tiniest difference. As mentioned earlier, use of plugins also impact the results. The way the DAW stores and manipulates the digital zeros and ones however, can also impact the results (bit depth, floating point, sample rate, encoding algorithm, etc.). These are hardware converters so they are not the reason a DAW sound different (better) than another.
![slate vcc on mixbus slate vcc on mixbus](https://digitalaudioservice.de/media/catalog/product/cache/700x700/slate-digital-vcc-2-0-virtual-console-collection-(download).jpg)
The converters that convert the analog sound into digital zeros and ones may do so differently and therefore produce different results. Perhaps one DAW has rounder zeros and straighter ones. I wouldn't want to mix a band in Pyramix though.īottom line, different tools for different engineers.ĭigital Audio is all zeros and ones.
![slate vcc on mixbus slate vcc on mixbus](https://everythingrecording.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/FGBOMBER.png)
That said, everything in his chain from the HDX playback is top shelf including the cabling.
#Slate vcc on mixbus pro
I use Pro Tools because I've been using it since 2003 and the workflow assists me in getting the sound I want.įor the record, the mastering engineer I just worked with really like tracking into Pyramix and says he likes the way it sounds. I think if any DAW truly does sound better than the other, it's going to be microscopic compared to all the other decisions you have to make when creating a good sounding product. Thought I'd share this with you all.īut again I'm really interested to know if Presonus' DAW truly sounds better then Pro Tools 11? Is it really smoother and like analog? Again Studio One 2 I clicked on bounce to new track it created 4 minute midi kick drum in seconds. If your song averages 3 to 5 minutes we all know it's time consuming. I have tried Studio One 2 producer and I have to say it offers a much faster work flow then Pro Tools in quite a few areas like bouncing a midi track in seconds compared to Pro Tools 11 the way where we must create a new audio track set up input n outputs then adjust level and wait untill your part is recorded on to a new audio track.Įxample one obviously must wait for kick n snare to finish the length of your song.
#Slate vcc on mixbus professional
Studio One 2 sounds better it's smooth and like anolog.ĭo you like Studio One 2 professional over Pro Tools 11? Is Presonus' claim that Studio One 2 truly is the best sounding DAW? Presonus claims this right from thier website. I'm a pro tools user for quite some time now.